Welcome Guest Login or Signup LANGUAGE:
Blog
Forum
Marketplace
FORUM
New Posts | My Topics | Profile Forum | User Settings | Subscriptions
Post Reply
Leasehold vs Freehold
Total Views: 142 - Total Replies: 6
Apr 04 2008, 7:59 am - By Cymru


Which catagory do you fit into??

 

Freehold

Freehold gives the purchaser complete ownership of the land and all the buildings on it. A freehold gives the buyer the right to do as they like with their home, subject to the law and planning controls.

Any property that is freehold - or in the case of a flat has a share of the freehold - is likely to be more valuable.

 

Leasehold

A leasehold property is leased from the freeholder for a specified period of time. The lease usually includes a range of terms and conditions, specifying the leaseholder's responsibilities to the property and the freeholder.

Leases can be long or short term - a long-term lease, for example 999 years, is likely to be in demand from someone looking to buy a home. A short-term lease, say, for a few years, means the property is effectively being rented.

It is sometimes possible to extend the length of a lease or buy a share of the freehold - a process known as enfranchisement.

Apr 04 2008, 8:40 am - Replied by: liowkc


The advantages of freehold property is fully reflected in the higher price compared to a 99-lease property.  Besides these 2 usual classes property, you will see 999 year lease properties which are priced somewhere in between.
Apr 05 2008, 1:50 pm - Replied by: sanju123


Actually there is not much difference between the two but I would prefer leasehold as I can obtain it at much lower price.The conditions when checked in detail are not very complicated for leasehold property.The lease tenure is definitely important.
Apr 06 2008, 1:35 am - Replied by: cassiem0221


We are currently looking to be freehold. I don't think we would even consider leasehold simply too much involved with that. I'd like to modify my home as desired and do as I desire in my home!
Apr 06 2008, 1:38 am - Replied by: scott



cassiem0221 wrote:
We are currently looking to be freehold. I don't think we would even consider leasehold simply too much involved with that. I'd like to modify my home as desired and do as I desire in my home!

 

 

I agree there Cassie, to me the concept of leasehold seem just like a longterm rent. Ok you get security that you can stay, but any structural changes you might want to make are a no-no right?

Apr 06 2008, 1:52 am - Replied by: liowkc


If you can afford it, go for freehold with no strings attached to future ownership - you may wish to pass on to your love ones beyond one or two generations.

If current financial situation does not permit, then leasehold is the only option - go for properties that have at least 60 years to go.

Apr 26 2008, 7:09 am - Replied by: ruthrbns


Free hold is always better because it gives you full control on the property you have.

Ruthrbns
Loss Mitigation Consultants Wanted Nationwide
Get Career Training in Loss Mitigation / Foreclosure Prevention
Earn $500-$2000 per client while saving their homes from foreclosure
Get Free Info Here-http://www.mhvfreedomforeclosure.com

Post Reply

© 2008 Leading Real Estate