| FORUM |
| Post Reply |
|
|
Leasehold vs Freehold
|
|
| Total Views: 147 - Total Replies: 6 | |
|
Apr 04 2008, 7:59 am - By Cymru
|
|
|
Which catagory do you fit into??
Freehold Freehold gives the purchaser complete ownership of the land and all the buildings on it. A freehold gives the buyer the right to do as they like with their home, subject to the law and planning controls. Any property that is freehold - or in the case of a flat has a share of the freehold - is likely to be more valuable.
Leasehold A leasehold property is leased from the freeholder for a specified period of time. The lease usually includes a range of terms and conditions, specifying the leaseholder's responsibilities to the property and the freeholder. Leases can be long or short term - a long-term lease, for example 999 years, is likely to be in demand from someone looking to buy a home. A short-term lease, say, for a few years, means the property is effectively being rented. It is sometimes possible to extend the length of a lease or buy a share of the freehold - a process known as enfranchisement. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 04 2008, 8:40 am - Replied by: liowkc
|
|
|
The advantages of freehold property is fully reflected in the higher price compared to a 99-lease property. Besides these 2 usual classes property, you will see 999 year lease properties which are priced somewhere in between.
|
|
Apr 05 2008, 1:50 pm - Replied by: sanju123
|
|
|
Actually there is not much difference between the two but I would prefer leasehold as I can obtain it at much lower price.The conditions when checked in detail are not very complicated for leasehold property.The lease tenure is definitely important.
|
|
Apr 06 2008, 1:35 am - Replied by: cassiem0221
|
|
|
We are currently looking to be freehold. I don't think we would even consider leasehold simply too much involved with that. I'd like to modify my home as desired and do as I desire in my home!
|
|
Apr 06 2008, 1:38 am - Replied by: scott
|
|||
|
I agree there Cassie, to me the concept of leasehold seem just like a longterm rent. Ok you get security that you can stay, but any structural changes you might want to make are a no-no right? |
||
|
Apr 06 2008, 1:52 am - Replied by: liowkc
|
|
|
If you can afford it, go for freehold with no strings attached to future ownership - you may wish to pass on to your love ones beyond one or two generations.
If current financial situation does not permit, then leasehold is the only option - go for properties that have at least 60 years to go. |
|
Apr 26 2008, 7:09 am - Replied by: ruthrbns
|
|
|
Free hold is always better because it gives you full control on the property you have.
Ruthrbns Loss Mitigation Consultants Wanted Nationwide Get Career Training in Loss Mitigation / Foreclosure Prevention Earn $500-$2000 per client while saving their homes from foreclosure Get Free Info Here-http://www.mhvfreedomforeclosure.com |
| Post Reply |
|










